Ethical Recovery at Siemens AG

The bribery scandal that rocked Siemens fromcooperation and carried out such extensive
2006-2008 was a lesson for other companies toremediation."
learn from and also set the stage for increasedEthical Recovery
inforcement for those violating anti-bribery policies.An investigation was launched into the bribery
Prior to the bribery scandal, Siemens had anscandal in 2006 and was completed in 2008. The
ethics and compliance program in place, however,cooperation exhibited by employees at
there was a missing link between leadership andSiemens allowed the investigation to be
the enforcement of the program. The company'sconducted in less time than
cooperation during the SEC investigation assistedoriginally predicted. Rather than replacing former
the company in receiving a reduced penalty, butexecutives with individuals from inside the
also gave way to a complete re-design of thecompany, Siemens filled the roles of major
company's internal ethics and compliance controls.positions with outsiders- which was probably for
There are many lessons learned from thethe best. In 2007, Peter Solmssen was brought
Siemens charges, the reaction to the investigationinto to clean up the ethics and compliance disaster
and the actions taken by Siemens to position theat Siemens.  Also in 2007, Siemens named Peter
company as an ethics and compliance leader inLöscher as the company's new CEO.
the post-scandal era.Siemens has worked to improve their corporate
Bribery Investigationreputation by ensuring that compliance is
An amnesty plan had been worked out withintegrated into the furthest reaching corners of
Siemens, as employees willing to come forwardtheir business. Siemens hired Michael Hershman, of
with information pertaining to the bribery scandalTransparency International, to help build a
and identifying key players, would be free fromcompliance and anti-corruption policy and training
prosecution. In a report from the Wall Streetprogram. Similar to the actions taken by Ed
Journal, the amnesty program was offered to allBreen at Tyco, Löscher replaced many of the
Siemens employees (110 of which came forwardcompany's top executives to start fresh. In most
with information), with the exception of the 300companies the ethics and compliance department
employees who made up the company's topremains fairly small, however, Siemens was
executive team. One particular employee whodetermined to put their words into actions and
provided inside information was indicted employeecreated an ethics and compliance department
Reinhard Siekaczek. He reported that he managedconsisting of 600 employees- one of the largest
an annual budget worth $40-50 million, which wasto date.
considered to be a "bribery budget". As reportedSince the Settlement, Siemens has divided the
in the New York Times article "At Siemens,company into three divisions in order to clarify
Bribery Was Just a Line Item," salepersons andreporting lines and increase responsibility. In the
managers within the company used this money-New York Times article "Siemens's Prosperity
"slush fund",  to maintain relations with corruptDoesn't Obscure Bribery Scandal," they discuss
government officials.the reasoning behind the division:
The level of cooperation in the investigation"Mr. Löscher also put the leaders of those three
significantly reduced the cost of the settlementsectors onto the central managing board in Munich.
with the SEC. In comparison to other companiesThat puts an end to a system in which a leader
hit with scandals, Siemens responded quickly toof a major business, like power generating, had
put measures in place to detect and preventhis own managing board and reported to Munich
future acts of bribery within the company. In theheadquarters without being based there. Siemens
New York Times article "At Siemens, Briberyofficials say the old way allowed corruption to
Was Just a Line Item," they state Siemens wasspread and inhibited accountability."
provided with additional leniency, only having toSiemens has developed a training program, with
plead to accounting violations, "because pleading toemployees at various levels receiving training in
bribery violations would have barred Siemensregards to issues faced based on employee role.
from bidding on government contracts in theThe format and frequency of training also varies
United States."depending on level within the organization. On the
In the Ethisphere article "Prepared Remarks toSiemens corporate website, they communicate
Compliance Week 2010- 5th Annual Conferencethat training includes topics such as foreign laws
for Corporate Financial, Legal, Risk, Audit &and corruption risks. Employees are now required
Compliance Officers," Assistant Attorney Generalto sign a statement after reviewing the
Lanny A. Breuer states:company's code of conduct, in order to
"In the end, the benefits Siemens receivedcommunicate their commitment and understanding
through its cooperation, even in the absence of aof the code.
voluntary disclosure, were plain – the $450Here is a link to a slide deck I came across from
million fine that was paid to the Justicea presentation prepared by Siemens titled
Department, although quite substantial, was a far"Compliance Program at Siemens," presented
cry from the advisory range of $1.35 billion toat Strengthening Integrity In Private Sector
$2.7 billion called for in the Sentencing Guidelines.Organized by UNDP, MENA-OECD. The slides
Put another way, Siemens received a penalty thatcontain specific information related to the ethics
was 67 to 84% less than what it otherwise couldand compliance program currently in place at
have faced had it not provided extraordinarySiemens.